A Referendum on Morals

What does it mean to take the moral action. Do we define it as being right, or just that, that something is more right than something else. Is it absolute or is it broken down, disambiguate. Can we say that something is wrong, without being wrong. Am I somewhat clear on this matter or is it fuzzy. Is there such a thing as clarity or am I unclear, when I say there is none. Morals, a tricky matter.

Freedom Disambiguation

Freedom is something that is as complex as it is simple, in other words it is only as complex as you make it. If you choose to look at the basics and many people do, you’ll find that freedom is an easy concept to understand. Freedom is the ability to choose, put quite simply and is nothing more, in it’s base. But when you delve deeper you find yourself sinking into it’s hypnotic allure that will eventually encapsulate your very soul, define who you are and change your very character because freedom is the only thing that we dream of, it’s left in the dreams to have no limitations; that is to be truly free.

Cognizant Thought and Independent Development

Reality is the combination of all of mankind's perceptions, individually ordained and possibly endowed by some sentient being. This collectivized reality contains the whole idea of meaning because without meaning there is nothing, this is usurped by the simple logic that nothing begets nothing and something only comes from something ie something perceived (to conceptualize with cognizant thought, here to, brought on by the ideas of humanity). These ideas are based on the basic belief that humanity does only make simple strides forward and the only reason is because of peoples' reluctance to admonish other's ideas because men are naturally narcissistic and need to be pushed in one direction or the other by an individual with great enough problem solving ability (someone who has the ability to solve problems like world hunger and population control). The tendency for the "Group" to prevent other people from making great leaps forward is mainly because people can not live without constants, constants are needed in order to create order in an other wise chaotic world.

In order to move on with this theorem we must first be able to define truth; truth is the conception or simple perception of things that are real and are inherently connected by a sole purpose where the idea of this "truth" without a doubt is accepted by the general population of thinkers. In this truth we find constants (things which have been proven through the use of mathematics and or scientific venture) the constants are responsible for holding the beliefs of the people's civilization and are completely responsible for the moral clauses that may be made. The constants also should guide the sciences and mathematical ideals of a given society with a certain amount of freedom ordained based on the consensus that without freedom how could anyone get anywhere with any idea (without a certain level of freedom to examine the possibility of more constants). This should consist of the ideology of Greek thinkers like Socrates, Aristotle and Plato.

People's entire lives are centered on the idea of searching for truth in a number of areas. This "truth" is the essence of God in a lost world, one in which there is no real compassion for humanity and the needs of others. People live and die with out ever having a chance to discover truth because the answer isn't clear and can never be verified. But it's the unverifiable truth that is often the most important because it's what hope is based on. Without hope man is soulless and just an animal with higher brain function, maybe given to him by God, but that is irrelevant still. The world is indeed mad, mad with deception, power, lust and violence completely contorted in every sense of the word. So is there a God, that just may be an unverifiable truth but if he doesn't exist then there's no point in anything.

In my own search for meaning in this world, I have found that any answer is often met with another question, solutions are prohibited by a constant array of problems that seem to be an infinite spiral. We are indeed a backwards people because humanity can get no where, because what do we really know. We can’t answer the question, why do we know what we know? So that leaves us with the only possible answer, we know nothing! There are all these books that claim to have the answers but none of them do and it’s blatantly obvious. That’s why there is so much pain in the world, the human mind seeks answers when there really is no ultimate end all be all affinity to search after, and so we give up because there is no hope. No hope to breath the light of day that causes death to the soul, to the sorrow of the next generation, who has only the hope to hope, don’t take that away because that is all that there is, isn’t it! The only thing worth believing in is logic, reason, and above all else hope in something more, but we do not know what that something is. Perhaps the hope that humanity can be better will suffice, because either God doesn't exist or he just doesn't care, so why not hope in something within our grasp, a mutable cause.

Theory of Everything

Drew Alexander Higgins
Theorem Part 1 In Retrospect this is completely theoretical and if there are errors please keep in mind that I wrote this when I was 12. Some of the term's were constructed by me like "unknown connector" which apparently wasn't so unknown, and yes I do know that it is a real scientific concept but it seemed to me at the time to be the best possible name for a theoretical concept (I had no knowledge of what dark matter was until I did some light reading and found out that it was actually something). Not bad for a twelve year old, huh. I think that the unknowable force that I was referring to is something defined by science now, I am not sure, if you have a prospective answer to my question, please post it? Also keep in mind that I believed in God, when I was twelve and this was me trying to prove his existence through scientific speculation.

A series of open ended questions to come to a logical conclusion in the theory of the universe or simply stated everything?


The theorem of dark matter: The connector of the universe. Dark matter is clearly not everything but does have something to do with everything.

Dark matter is quite a simple concept to grasp: for everything that has an atomic value it is nearly ¼ parts dark matter AKA the unknowable force. It quite simply holds everything together.

If the unknowable force proves to be God then we know that there must be life outside of this galaxy because it becomes no longer a chanced creation but something that should occur more often then not. This is based upon his choice not ours, or some natural occurrence.

This theorem could quite possibly complete 1 or 2 things. It can A, prove Gods existence through science and mathematics or B, disprove Gods existence through science. but it is becoming increasingly more and more obvious that the chances are more likely that God exists rather then that he does not.

How do we define God? Is it really our place to define God? That’s what this theorem is doing in all actuality it is defining God. To a certain degree it is actually defeating the purpose of free thinking because the end result will all be the same. If we think at one with the universe we are not really thinking for ourselves. It is not our thought it is Gods thought. What about free will. If this is the case then this is quite possibly the most predictable ending to the planet as we know it. Loss of thought. Look at your dog does it really know that it is alive. It does not really know much of anything at all. It is a simple, if then solution, if there is no thought then there is no life. Does it really matter if you’re alive but you do not know it? This really defines life its self to a certain degree, intelligence is life.

My definition of God: an all knowing being that has come to understand the universe and all that it entitles. If it is not alive then it can not interact with any other form of energy. Remember intelligence is life. The only Beings in the universe who have some control over there surrounding environment are human beings. Without intelligence you can not affect any other form of energy. So I argue that the universe and all that it is could not have been created without some sort of intelligent design.


Sorry if it sounds like I am all over the place it is after all about everything.





Theorem part 2

First we have to define the unknowable force before we can move on. What is the unknowable force simply stated everything. So in a way science has only just begun to define the unknowable force because in part it is in everything which means that it is everything. If you can recall back at the beginning of the first page I had just begun to define dark matter and the unknowable force which are both tied together in someway but are not the same but have like concepts and properties. But in its essence it is still all the same. After a lot of thought I have decided to define the unknowable force as the force that holds everything together.

The properties of God is the only living thing (which is thought) that has properties that can be defined as an unknowable force, which to a certain degree we can define God as an individual who is an unknowable force.

Second Law of Thermodynamics clearly states that there is x amount of energy and you cannot create any more but, one form of energy can change into another. Nikola Tesla had many theories that stated such things possible that seemed impossible but proven possible.

Is the unknowable force, a form of energy yet to be discovered? It is clearly impossible for the unknowable force to be another form of energy if the unknowable force is God. Because any one form of energy can be changed into another. That means that we could then create God and or God could create himself. It is possible to turn any form of energy into another. F.f/f =, q, s, f , f= force q=quantum s=space.

If there is a God then that being, who is all knowing has defined everything which would give him the power over all other forms of energy he could then turn any form of energy into another and create all the forms of energy as we know them? Creation verses happenings.

This I believe may scientifically speaking define God (a being who has come to understand the universe and all that it entitles.)

Let me define something, there is a difference between knowing every thought and idea and knowing all truths. A lot of thoughts and ideas are wrong. An all knowing being would have to know all truths in order to have absolute ideals. Not ideas held by man but ideas that have absolute truth. Which I believe is unattainable by man but by God alone.






Theorem Part 3


Dark matter is in everything, its all around you and it is apart of you. So in a way dark matter is everything because it is in everything. So to try and define dark matter it would be like defining everything. Which is clearly impossible because of humanities inability to understand everything? It is nearly impossible to define dark matter but I believe this may be the best possible definition. Dark matter: everything that has an atomic value or its own gravitational force is nearly ¼ parts dark matter next to nothingness.

The Gods honest truth is that there is no truth. If you think about it, there is always a lie in a truth. Everything has a weakness and weakness is not whole so therefore there is not truth without wholeness. The only truth is that of God because by the definition of God there is no weakness in him. So in other words there is no absolute truth without God. In order for some one to have an understanding of everything he would have to understand all truths. We have to face the inevitable; we will never be able to define everything, because it is simply above humanity. I do not believe that there is a numerical number that can be attached to the quantum of everything for one simplistic reason, because I believe the universe goes on and on and on for an infinite amount of space that cannot be measured. So another simple, if then principle: if there is an infinite amount of space then there is an unknowable quantum attached to the universe and or the cosmos. This does not necessarily mean that there is not a finite amount of energy in the universe it just simply means that nothingness occurs all around us.

Dark matter is most likely the connector of the universe, if anything at all. It is the force that holds everything together and causes tranquility in the midst of chaos. Atoms racing at a million miles an hour and they do not spin out of control. What holds them together? Some would say gravity, but that makes no sense at all! Without this force life would be impossible! Everything that is naturally occurring would rapidly expand causing an implosion of sorts.

Interpreting energies through mathematics and uncovering the principles of energy. Attaching any mathematical value to something would be attaching a mathematical value to any force. So mathematics is a language we use it to describe things that happen all around us. All things that occur around us naturally we interpret with mathematics. With out math we would be nothing more than animals running around only meeting are bare necessities. So encouraged logical thought, through mathematical thinking will help us to interpret all forms of energy.